Wednesday 23 May, 2012
Online Payments
Questions & Answers session with Abdelmajid Moujane, payments specialist at Callataÿ & Wouters Tuesday 17 August 2010 | 11:12 AM CET
The Paypers: In its latest newsletter, EPC Chair Gerard Hartsink clearly states that setting in place a binding EC-backed instrument (which would serve the purpose of setting end dates for compliance of euro credit transfer and euro direct debit schemes with so-called "essential requirements") would do more harm than good.


In Mr. Hartsink’s own words, “this piece of financial legislation now in the pipeline reflects political pretence rather than a regulatory intervention aimed at making SEPA a reality. If endorsed by EU lawmakers, the legislative act currently envisaged would effectively derail the entire SEPA project and deprive bank customers of the benefits associated with the SEPA harmonization initiative”. Do you share this view? What is your perception on this issue of “technical standards” (EPC) versus “essential requirements & functional services” (EC)?

Print | Contact editor | Mail
© 2012 The Paypers
More: Full article

This Month

Next Month

There are no calendar dates this week. Go to monthly overview.